top of page
Project
MEIOR Final Conference
Panel I
Prof. Michele Panzavolta - Findings of the MEIOR Research - Belgium
Prof. Marcello Daniele - Findings of the MEIOR Research - Italy
Prof. Slawomir Steinborn - Dawid Åšwieczkowski - Findings of the MEIOR Research - Poland
Prof. Lorena Bachmaier Winter - Findings of the MEIOR Research - Spain
Prof. Maria Bergström - Johanna Enström - Findings of the MEIOR Research - Sweden
Panel II
Nicholas Franssen - A Dutch perspective on judicial control incross-border investigations
Catherine Van de Heyning - The Belgian experience with EIO in obtaining e-evidence
Wojciech Jasiński - Where to place legal safeguards in the EIO procedure? Controversiesover issuing an EIO regarding information covered by banking secrecy in Poland
Chloé Fauchon - Legal remedies in EIO proceedings: focus on the French regulation
Panel III
Prof. Martin Böse - Judicial scrutiny in EIO proceedings: the approach in Germany toadmissibility issues in EncroChat cases
Oscar Calavita - Sky ECC and Encrochat: to be or not to be interception, that is thequestion. The Italian perspective
Fabio Nicolicchia - Judicial oversight in EIO procedures for the transfer of communicationdata: assessing legality and proportionality of the exchange of information in the digital era
Jan-Jaap Oerlemans - Police Hacking operations in light of EncroChat and SkyECC
Panel IV
Luca De Matteis - Cross-border acquisition of evidence in EPPO investigations: from MLA to mutual recognition to Article 31
Anna Mosna - Allocation of judicial review in cross-border investigations: EIO vs EPPO
Nicolò Gibelli - Cutting corners: borrowing the meaning of “judicial authority” from the EIO in EPPO transnational investigations
Panel V
Massimo Bolognari - EIO violating human rights: between automatic refusal of cooperation andindividualized harmfulness assessment
Francesco Sanvitale - The CJEU’s Evolving Perspective on Judicial Oversight: A Critical Analysis of the EIO case law
Gianluca Borgia - Fundamental rights at risk and refusal to cooperate: ‘safety valve’ or style clause?
Małgorzata Wąsek-Wiaderek - Does ECHR's jurisprudence offer clear guidelines on admissibility ofdomestic and foreign evidence?
Lorenzo Bernardini - Non-Suspended Execution of an EIO: Examining the Effectiveness of Legal Remedies and Their Impact on Evidence Admissibility
Panel VI
Karolina Kiejnich-Kruk - Are the effective remedies really effective? (Not) a long way from the European Investigation Order to the European Preservation and Production Orders
Costanza De Caro - Financial investigations in cross-border criminal prosecution between the freezing of evidence and the freezing of assets
bottom of page