top of page
Project
Judicial protection in EU cross-border evidence gathering: workshop presentations
Panel I: Structures of Judicial Scrutiny between Autonomous Concepts and Procedural Autonomy
-
Effective judicial protection after Gavanozov II
-
Lack of legal remedy regarding the investigative measure carried out under the EIO in the context of effective judicial protection in national law
-
Judicial independence and effective judicial protection in cross-border evidence gathering
Panel III: Evidence Gathering between Police Lawful Decryption and Police Hacking
-
EncroChat between legal decryption and police hacking
-
Verification in the issuing state of evidence obtained on the basis of an EIO
-
EncroChat cases in Sweden and the non-references for preliminary rulings
-
EncroChat cases in Germany and the reference for preliminary ruling
Panel II: Judicial Protection in and Beyond Mutual Recognition: EIO vs EPPO
-
Scope of judicial review in the executing MS in EIO proceedings
-
Cooperation of Poland with EPPO in evidence taking
-
Cross-border gathering of evidence under the EPPO Regulation – missing EU regulation?
-
Cross-border evidence gathering under art. 31 EPPO Regulation
Panel IV: The New E-evidence Package: New Frontier of (Mutual) Trust?
-
New EU e-evidence system as a new step in mutual recognition - legal issues and defence rights
-
Gathering e-evidence under the new EPO-mechanism. Whose Rights and Whose Responsibilities?
bottom of page